Comments on: That can’t be too tough http://www.osellus.com/blogs/2007/10/28/that-cant-be-too-tough/ Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:04:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: Surveys Authority http://www.osellus.com/blogs/2007/10/28/that-cant-be-too-tough/comment-page-1/#comment-1126 Surveys Authority Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:03:17 +0000 http://www.osellus.com/blogs/2007/10/28/that-cant-be-too-tough/#comment-1126 I'm often to blogging and i seriously appreciate your content. The content has really peaks our interest. I will bookmark your blog Osellus Blogs » That can’t be too tough and preserve checking for new information. If you are willing, I will share with you the secrets of making money online with paid surveys. More info on my site if you need it. I’m often to blogging and i seriously appreciate your content. The content has really peaks our interest. I will bookmark your blog Osellus Blogs » That can’t be too tough and preserve checking for new information. If you are willing, I will share with you the secrets of making money online with paid surveys. More info on my site if you need it.

]]> By: David http://www.osellus.com/blogs/2007/10/28/that-cant-be-too-tough/comment-page-1/#comment-204 David Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:41:55 +0000 http://www.osellus.com/blogs/2007/10/28/that-cant-be-too-tough/#comment-204 Instead of a one-way data transfer from Jazz to Microsoft documents, I think a much more useful exercise would be to extend MS Office to make it Jazz aware. This would allow the Office applications to behave as Jazz clients much like Microsoft and others have done for VSTS. Without Jazz awareness, I feel that these other applications would be limited to reporting functions and be of little use to the project management community. I see this more as an exercise in extending MS Office (or your application of choice) rather than extending Jazz and can understand why IBM would be looking for partners to provide such a solution for their customers. Instead of a one-way data transfer from Jazz to Microsoft documents, I think a much more useful exercise would be to extend MS Office to make it Jazz aware. This would allow the Office applications to behave as Jazz clients much like Microsoft and others have done for VSTS. Without Jazz awareness, I feel that these other applications would be limited to reporting functions and be of little use to the project management community.

I see this more as an exercise in extending MS Office (or your application of choice) rather than extending Jazz and can understand why IBM would be looking for partners to provide such a solution for their customers.

]]>